Username:   Remember Me
Password:  

Uber Articles {Über (ger) adj. above, beyond }

- Above and Beyond a Mere Article Directory

 
 


Personal Injury Claims Statistics

By michal costaminnego | August 17, 2007 | Popularity: unranked (?)

An important ulterior goal is to give at least a preliminary evaluation of the contention that both the number and the cost of claims have been driven to record levels. If the figures bear this out, it would lend support to those who consider the UK to be gripped by a compensation culture, and undermine the Government’s view that, although the compensation culture is a myth, the public’s erroneous belief that it exists results in real and costly burdens.
Compensation Recovery Unit statistics say that the number of claims has increased only by three per cent in the last five years. The more detailed figures reveal that not all types of injury have reflected in this small increase. In particular, it is notable that accident claimshave actually declined, and it is the substantial rise in claims for disease that accounts for the overall increase.
The Insurers’ Bodily Injury Awards Studies. Throughout the period studied, legal costs, including both claimant and defendant costs, averaged 30 per cent of the total motor personal injury claims. This means that legal costs continued to increase by more than double the rate of the rise of national average earnings.
National Health Service statistics provide that there has undoubtedly been a very great increase in clinical negligence claims in the last 30 or so years. The Pearson Commission reported in 1978 that the number of claims of malpractice against doctors and dentists (including those in private practice) had been running at about 500 a year. By 1990-1991, the estimated number of new medical claims made against the NHS in England had risen to between 5419 and 6979 for the year. The Oxfordshire study reported a “steady growth” in new claims in the period 1974-1998. In answers to Parliamentary questions in 2005, the number of claims made from 1996-2004 was broken down, using information supplied by the NHSLA. These figures confirmed the “continuation of the downward trend” in claims numbers that has been evident in recent years. They now are close to the lowest estimate for the year 1990-1991, coming down from a peak in the period 1997-2002.
Cost of claims
A complete picture of the NHS’s annual expenditure on clinical negligence compensation in England is available from 1996. This reveals a general upwards trend up to and including the year 2004-2005. The figures are startlingly higher than those available for the start of the 1990’s, when the annual cost of clinical negligence compensation was reported to have been L53.2 and L51.3m in 1990-1991 and 1991-1992 respectively. Even these are very much higher than the estimated figure for 1974-75 of L1m. In claims for clinical negligence that were closed by the NHSLA in 2004-2005, defence and claimant costs were equal to, respectively, 13.76 per cent and 19.81 per cent of damages.

Outstanding liabilities for clinical negligence
One of the most frequently misapplied statistics in the current compensation culture debate is the annual estimate of the NHS’s outstanding liabilities for clinical negligence (including both known and unknown but expected claims, and taking into account the likelihood of settlement). This has risen from L3.2 billion in 1999 to L5.9 billion in 2003 and L7.8 billion in 2004. The figures refer to liabilities that the NHS claims will arise over a longer period of time, and are very much greater than the sums that are actually paid out on an annual basis. Estimating the cost of outstanding liabilities is an exercise that is fraught with difficulties and the resulting figure representing a “worst case” scenario has been heavily criticised. Although the estimate of outstanding liabilities is frequently cited in the press and media, it must be handled with care. It would be quite wrong, for example, to use it to calculate the percentage of the annual NHS budget that is currently spent on clinical negligence compensation.
These figures provide the basis for an initial examination of the claim that a damaging compensation culture has developed in the UK in recent years.
Injuryadvice4u is a UK based company, providing free advice on accident at work claim, falls compensation claim

www.injuryadvice4u.co.uk

Article kindly provided by UberArticles.com

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Topics: Legal | Comments Off


Article Citation
MLA Style Citation:
Costaminnego, Michal "Personal Injury Claims Statistics." Personal Injury Claims Statistics. 17 Aug. 2007. www.uberarticles.com. 17 Mar 2010 <http://www.uberarticles.com/legal/personal-injury-claims-statistics>.

APA Style Citation:
Costaminnego, M (2007, August 17). Personal Injury Claims Statistics. Retrieved March 17, 2010, from http://www.uberarticles.com/legal/personal-injury-claims-statistics

Chicago Style Citation:
Costaminnego, Michal "Personal Injury Claims Statistics" www.uberarticles.com. http://www.uberarticles.com/legal/personal-injury-claims-statistics


Reprint Rights

Creative Commons License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License, which means you may freely reprint it, in its entirety, provided you include the author's resource box along with LIVE VISIBLE links (without "nofollow" tags). You must also include the credit to Uber Articles.

Comments are closed.

Disclaimer
Uber Articles and its partner sites cannot be held responsible for either the content nor the originality of any articles. If you believe the article has been stolen from you without your permission, please contact us and we will remove it immediately. If you have a problem with the accuracy or otherwise of the content of an article, please contact the author, not us! Also, please remember that any opinions and ideas presented in any of the articles are those of the author and cannot be taken to represent the opinions of Uber Articles. All articles are provided for informational purposes only. None of them should be relied upon for medical, psychological, financial, legal, or other professional advice. If you need professional advice, see a professional. We cannot be held responsible for any use or misuse you make of the articles, nor can we be held responsible for any claims for earnings, cures, or other results that the article might make.